Censorship of the Internet is Wrong
- Length: 1364 words (3.9 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
Censorship of the Internet is Wrong
The Internet can be a very disturbing and adult medium. There are parts of the Internet that should not be viewed by children. Explicit information can be found which is intended for an adult audience but children who have access to the Internet have become exposed to this material. The question at hand is who is responsible for preventing these children from viewing this material. Censoring the entire Internet would be one capable option. Though this option would be effective but it wouldn't be practical. Censoring the Internet would limit what adults could view and communicate. Owners of Internet servers should know of the possible information and people that can be found in this medium. Having the access to the vast information available on the Internet, a responsibility is needed. Censorship of the Internet is not needed as a whole, but the reasons for censorship are understandable. These reasons though, should be the responsibility of the individual user, not the government. Relying on the government is not the answer.
Prevention of children viewing and having access to elicit material can be achieved without banning the material from the Internet. I fully believe in censorship of the Internet: Censorship by the parents for their children. All is needed is responsibility by the parents of the children. If you are a parent willing to provide your child access to the Internet, then you need to take precaution. Most parents would prevent their child from looking at the adult section in a movie store, which in many cases they can get access to, then why would they allow their children access to such material on the internet?
The Internet is something that most of us must buy access to and which we then choose to surf on our own. And does the government really have the right to tell parents what books and magazines they can let their children read at home or what television programs or motion pictures they should let their children watch? (Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, L.L.P.)
It is the parent's responsibility to limit the access of the Internet for their children. There are many options, which can prevent children from the access to the illicit material, which can be found through the Internet.
How to Cite this Page
| Essay about Internet Censorship in China - In the United States, every child, teenager and adult uses Wikipedia, YouTube and Facebook, among numerous other sites, regularly. The internet is open and uncensored for the most part, other than parental controls. In China, most, if not all of those types of sites are or have been blocked. As in, you could not go to them, unless you found some way around the web filters and firewalls the Chinese government runs in their country. While China defends their practice of internet censorship, based on “protecting” the people, heavy internet censorship is a block to free speech and impedes economic and social development in the 21st century.... [tags: Internet Censorship]|
:: 6 Works Cited
| Internet Censorship: How it effects education Essay examples - Internet Censorship: How it effects education How does Internet censorship effect education. That is the question that needs to be answered. Censorship cannot be completely done away with in schools, society, and the law would simply not allow it. The internet also cannot be completely censored, because the technology for that simply does not exist. People have various stances on this issue and they can be split up into four general groups: The Government, parents, students, and teachers. They all have different views on the issue, although who is right or wrong has not yet been decided.... [tags: Censorship]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| Global Look at Internet Censorship Essay - Global Look at Internet Censorship Introduction Many Americans take for granted the freedom that living in the United States allows us. As we go through our days, we whine about our bosses, the governor’s latest political agenda, or read commentary about how the war in Iraq is morally wrong. Whether we are sending e-mail, posting on message boards, or reading the news online, we are guaranteed the same freedom of self expression that we enjoy offline. In other countries, the mere act of accessing websites that criticize the government is an offense that can land you in prison.... [tags: Internet Censoring Censorship Cyberspace Essays]|
:: 3 Works Cited
|Censorship of Internet Pornography is Unconstitutional Essay - Imagine a place where you have access to anything and everything one could want. Some would say that is only existent in a utopia, and some would say that describes the Internet. Many adults go on to the net and access pornographic material that would be unsuitable for children. This is called cyberporn. The controversy lies in the fact that children are accessing these materials also. Government, activist groups, and concerned parents are fighting to regulate obscene material found over the Internet to protect children.... [tags: Internet Censorship]||2388 words|
| Censorship or Responsibility: Which is the Lesser of Two Evils? Essay - What If the entertainment that people indulged in was suddenly taken away in a flash and replaced by what the government believes is more appropriate. Government censorship is a hot topic that has surfaced once again. Many citizens of the country believe that the government should get involved in the censoring of video games, because many crimes committed by youths have been linked to violent video games, or so it seems. The truth is that there has never been any case declaring that there is a link between the two.... [tags: Censorship]|
:: 11 Works Cited
| Internet Censorship Essay - All I wanted to do was shop for new shoes online, but instead I was staring at a webpage packed with lewd photographs. I was only 14. I certainly was not looking to be directed to such a vulgar website; however, much to my dismay, I had simply mistyped the URL to a popular sporting goods store and found myself face-to-face with something I was much too young to see. Unfortunately, this happens all too often. A staggering amount of young children are accessing pornographic material online, whether they want to or not.... [tags: Internet Pornography Essays]|
:: 4 Works Cited
|Censorship and Internet Essay - Censorship and the Internet The Internet is the fastest growing and largest tool for mass communication and information distribution in the world. People use the Internet for communication, expressing their opinions, or obtaining unlimited information access. Nowadays, the issue of wether is it necessary to have censorship on the Internet is being argued all over the world. Censoring the Internet can protect children from strangers, filter unpleasant material and prevent young people imitating negative behaviour.... [tags: essays research papers]||888 words|
| The Controversy Over Internet Censorship Essay example - The Controversy Over Internet Censorship For many people, using the Internet has become practically a new way of life, especially for college students and the like. Various types of information can be accessed at the touch of a button: anything from encyclopedias, to surveys and essays, to articles from magazines, and adult sites. Anyone who pays for their Internet service is usually offered space for his or her own web page, and even many free services provide space for personal web pages. All of this available space can be used for any number of reasons: posting newsletters for community groups, advertising for businesses, or just voicing one’s opinion. For those of us who know... [tags: Television Media TV Censorship essays]|
:: 3 Works Cited
| The Concerns of Internet Censorship Essays - The Concerns of Internet Censorship As a professional Internet publisher and avid user of the Internet, I have become concerned with laws like the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) that censor free speech on the Internet. By approving the CDA, Congress has established a precedent which condones censorship regulations for the Internet similar to those that exist for traditional broadcast media. Treating the Internet like broadcast media is a grave mistake because the Internet is unlike any information medium that has been created.... [tags: Censoring Internet Rights Essays]|
:: 13 Works Cited
| Censorship in the Classroom Essays - Sex. Politics. Religion. The big three: a work of literature is often considered controversial because of its statement about or use of these topics. What makes these and other areas so touchy in the classroom. Why do some parents and concerned community members want controversial materials out of the classroom. In this look at the language of censorship, we must first define censorship, who does the censoring, and why. These will be the first three spotlights for looking at the language of censorship.... [tags: Censorship Essays]|
:: 9 Works Cited
Censorship Children Read Servers Censoring Surf Access Owners Material Limit Option
"In general, parents have access to a wider variety of Internet access controls than controls over cable television or the movies. Additionally, most children who live in environments in which their parents lack access to Internet protection likely also lack the resources to acquire computer technology and Internet access." (Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, L.L.P.) Some examples of these methods are the following. Filtering can be done by making a list of obscene words and phrases, or others that can be linked to content which you find objectionable, and make the system unable to download material in which the words or phrases are found. This can also be used in private email. Another way to monitor your Internet browsing is by subscribing to an approved online access. There are Internet servers, which will monitor the content for you. (Oram) PICS were an alternative to the 1995 Communications Decency Act. PICS were a system where web sites would rate themselves stating what kind of material it contained. Then parents could block web cites with certain material using software. (Garfinkel 43)
Another issue is the vast area the Internet reaches. If the United States should prohibit certain material over the Internet, does that justify that other countries, which used the same Internet programs, loose out on that material? The Internet doesn't start and end in a certain place. "Because of their international nature, the networks operate outside the framework of First Amendment protections familiar to most Americans."(Lewis 67) It would be very hard for every country, which is on the Internet to come together and make up a set of rules to outlaw certain material. "Nations have different views on what is permissible on the Internet."(Oumarou 38) The only way a country can effectively censor the Internet without hindering other countries access is to follow in China's footsteps. That would be to control who gets access to the Internet and regulate what they are using it for, also known as a communist government. "The responsibility for any censorship rests not with a central authority but with the administrators of the thousands of private and public computer networks."(Lewis 67) If there were laws, such as the Communications Decency Act of 1995, established by the United States government outlawing "indecent" material posted by users, there would still be companies from different countries feeding this material into the country. "Traditional media are identifiable and have a physical or material component that the authorities can call to account when they consider that the law has been broken." (Oumarou 38)
People who gain access to the Internet should be responsible enough to find out what exactly can be found there. Along with all of the information provided which would be positive to the user, they should know about all of the information that would be disturbing to the user. If then the user feels the Internet is worth it, it is their choice to purchase access the Internet. It is the same way with cable television. One could own a television and have the basic channels, which are censored, but choose to purchase cable television, which provides more channels but lacks the censors.
The rationale behind censoring broadcast but not printed media is the fact that broadcasting signals come through the walls of our homes regardless of whether or not we want them. These signals are considered "uninvited" thus the government feels they have the right to control the contents of the broadcasts. Books, magazines, and other printed material must physically be brought into our homes, so they are considered "invited" and cannot be censored. By purchasing a computer and using software to peruse the Internet, we "invite information into our home. The information available on the Internet should be treated like the information available in books and magazines and not be censored. (Bruce)
Censorship can be an obstacle in the way of the progress of mankind. "If censors of the past had been successful in eradicating art, philosophy and literature they deemed 'indecent' or 'obscene', we would not be able to cherish some of the work by the world's greatest minds." (Bruce) How could we make any progress without understanding the great ideas of the past? The advancement of the world has depended on abstract thinkers. Ideas of prohibiting information containing sexual content would not just prevent children from viewing, but would prevent people who could really use the information. "When you prohibit discussion of sexuality, you cut off information about one of the most important areas of human activity. Some of this information (such as how to avoid AIDS) can save lives. To censor material given to 17-year-olds is to trample on the rights of youth." (Oram) Progress would be hindered since the Internet is such a crucial source of communication for high school young adults. For example, this paper probably wouldn't be possible if the Internet was censored because of the words and opinions I ran across during the research.
In conclusion, the main reason the Internet does not need to be censored is the option available to users to avoid what they don't want to see. Again, the user buys access to the Internet, so no one is forcing this information into their homes. With these reasons, censorship is wrong in limiting one's potential on the Internet.
Bruce, Marty. Censorship on the Internet. April 1996. September 11, 1998.
Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, L.L.P. Can Congress Censor the Internet? 1996. September 9, 1998.
Garfinkel, Simson L. "The Web's Unelected Government." Technology Review: MIT's Magazine of Innovation. November/December 1998: 38-46.
Lewis, Peter H. "No More 'Anything Goes': Cyberspace Gets Censored." CyberReader. Ed. Vitanza, Victor J. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon, 1996. Pages 66-69.
Oram, Andrew. Government Censorship-Does it protect Children? November 22, 1995.
Oumarou, Seydou Amadou, and Rene Lefort. "The Web, the Spider, and the Fly." UNESCO: The Courier. September 1998: 38-40.
Show MoreThe Internet is an extremely educational and communicative tool. Everyone can access a tremendous amount of information and connect with people on the other end of the planet; it is capable of doing everything. Nowadays, the society is facing a variety of challenges and controversies which are mostly related to religion, morality, the economic crisis, etc., and the most talked-about issue in today’s world is “Internet censorship”. Although the Internet is very useful, many people are suggesting the idea of censoring the Internet; however, the government should not censor the Internet because a free and open Internet usage has many positive impacts on people’s lives.
Many opponents say that Internet censorship can protect their children…show more content…
Moreover, schools should have responsibilities to prevent students from accessing bad websites, like the library can use filtering programs to block students’ bad access. Therefore, the government should not control personal research because it can usually be used for educational purposes.
Opponents believe that the government should censor the Internet in order to prevent people from violating copyright laws. Thus, Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is a bill which is suggested to restrict and be against problems which concern intellectual property and copyright laws. However, the SOPA bill is not necessary because we already have laws to protect copyrights. If the SOPA bill is passed, it will negatively affect many websites like YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, etc. For instance, when someone distributes illegal content on the Internet, Google will be sued because it contains these sites. The SOPA bill has several negative impacts; as a result, many famous websites held a meeting to protest the SOPA bill, and they blacked out their logos to oppose the SOPA bill. Joshua Topolsky mentioned in his article, “Wikipedia shut down its site Wednesday to voice opposition to the laws (Google, Reddit and several other sites also protested similarly).” As a result, this bill has not passed yet. We can see that many people oppose Internet censorship.
The final argument by opponents of Internet censorship is that it is a way to police